Per seat or per use
Charging per seat or per unit of use changes who notices the bill. The finance contacts who pay the invoice, recruited for the study, show which pricing metric they can forecast and which they would push back on.
Use caseOptimize pricing
Set price levels and decide what goes into each tier from what buyers value and say they would pay, with the people who approve a purchase and the people who use the product heard separately.
A tier structure is a set of bets about who values what, and each bet can be checked with buyers before the price list is printed.
Buyers describe what the product is worth to them, what they compare it against and which outcomes would justify a higher price, all before a price appears, so no figure anchors what they say.
The person who signs the purchase and the people who use the product often value different things, so each group is interviewed separately and a tier is never built around the wrong group's priorities.
Alongside the interviews, a price survey asks buyers at which prices the product would seem a bargain, expensive or out of reach, which shows how many find each candidate level acceptable.
The world's most ambitious teams research with Pulse.
GrowwTiers work when each step up buys something a distinct group of buyers wants enough to pay for, and falter when the step looks arbitrary.
Analysis groups every feature buyers mentioned by how they talked about it, as expected in any version, worth paying extra for, or irrelevant, with the supporting quotes for each placement.
With features sorted, the team decides what anchors the entry tier, what justifies the step up and what stays an add-on, checking each placement against the share of buyers willing to pay for that feature.
Buyers explain why price weighs heavily or lightly for them, whether a tight approval limit, a lower-priced substitute or unclear value, which tells the team whether a lower price or a clearer offer is the fix.
Understand how customers perceive price, value and willingness to pay.
The price sensitivity template
Run this studySeveral established methods inform price levels and tiers. Van Westendorp's price sensitivity meter asks four questions about when a product seems too cheap, a bargain, expensive and too expensive, producing a range of acceptable prices. Gabor-Granger asks whether buyers would purchase at a series of prices, building a demand curve. Conjoint analysis estimates how much each feature is worth relative to price, which makes it the method of choice when tiers and bundles must be designed together. Qualitative interviews complete the picture by explaining how buyers judge value, what they compare against and which features they would pay more for. Good pricing research describes the offer realistically, recruits the people who actually decide, reads results by segment, and treats stated willingness to pay with caution, validating the chosen price with a limited launch or market test before rolling it out.
Charging per seat or per unit of use changes who notices the bill. The finance contacts who pay the invoice, recruited for the study, show which pricing metric they can forecast and which they would push back on.
A free tier's limits decide how many users ever pay. Asking free users what they would have to hit before upgrading, and grouping their answers by the limit named, shows product where the free plan's ceiling should sit.
Offered monthly and annual billing at each candidate price in a survey, buyers show finance how many would commit to a year, and at what discount the annual plan starts to win.